Mark N wrote:
Well, it takes a lot of energy, time, and money to upkeep a system as big as LA's system. Also, I'm not sure how many times LA is faced with flood/tsunami threats, but if its not often (as in 10+ years) then there is no need. If I remember correctly, LA has over 40 500Ts, and the system is dominantly SD-10s ( I think at least 96 of them left).
There is VERY little threat of a tsunami actually causing damage in LA County, other than along the immediate coastline. Although we have been calling the LA system, the "LA County" system, the network is actually solely within the City of Los Angeles. Other cities within LA County had their own sirens, and in some cases their own test plan. Many coastal cities (Huntington Beach in Orange County, Ventura County, San Luis Obispo, and others) have tsunami sirens. The only places where the City of Los Angeles touches the ocean, are Playa Del Rey, Venice Beach, Palisades Beach and San Pedro. All other coastline is incorporated as self-contained cities (from south to north; Long Beach, Redondo, Hermosa, Manhattan, El Segundo, Santa Monica, and Malibu).
The only place I can think of, which would be at a Phuket Island-type tsunami disaster, would be Venice Beach, and inland from there through Mar Vista and Culver City. Other places along the coastline, are sharply elevated just beyond the beach, and in some cases 100 feet elevation. In Malibu for instance, you climb to 2000 feet within a mile or so from the ocean as you drive inland. Surely a tsunami warning siren network would be an excellent idea, but sadly, the County is broke, and I'm sure sirens are so low on their list of priorities that they might as well be forgotten...
Charles